Legal Opinion

Kuzma v. Kaczur Et Ux.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 21, 1966No. 20,011Published

1Opinion

On Petition foe Rehearing

Bierly, J.

The citation of errors presented by the petitioner has been corrected.

Inasmuch as the judgment of the court indicated the interest should begin from September 27, 1955, we are bound by the terms of the judgment, and make no correction thereof.

*528We think other matters brought out in the Petition for Rehearing are insufficient to grant a rehearing and hence the Petition for Rehearing is hereby denied.

Note. — Opinion and opinion on Petition for Rehearing denied in 214 N. E. 2d 195.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kuzma v. Kaczur Et Ux.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1966