Legal Opinion

Guidry v. Petty Concrete Company

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1967No. 8146PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOOD, Judge, Court of Appeals.

All of the issues relate to the absence of findings of fact and conclusions of law.

At the close of plaintiff’s evidence, the trial court sustained defendants’ motion to dismiss under § 21-1-1(41) (b), N.M.S.A. 1953. The parties were given time to submit requested findings and conclusions. Defendants did so. Plaintiff did not— neither before nor after entry of judgment. Nor did plaintiff make a general request for findings. (Plaintiff’s counsel on appeal was not the trial attorney.) The trial court did not make findings nor conclusions.

Plaintiff appeals…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. DesGeorges v. GraingerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Edington v. AlbaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Mascarenas v. KennedyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Jontz v. AldereteNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Isaac v. SeguritanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cockrell v. CockrellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Goldie v. YakerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Wallace v. WanekNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Lopez v. Schultz & Lindsay Construction Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Gruschus v. CR Davis Contracting CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API