Legal Opinion
NEC Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided May 10, 1988No. Court No. 88-03-00204PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Watson, Judge:
The process of filing a summons to commence an action for judicial review of determinations in antidumping or countervailing duty matters continues to be a fertile source of procedural puzzles for the courts. See, NEC Corp. v. United States, 806 F.2d 247 (Fed. Cir. 1986); Daewoo Electronics, Co. v. United States, 655 F. Supp. 508 (CIT 1987). Plaintiffs’ motion to amend its summons, under Rule 3(d) of the Rules of this Court, is the occasion for this dispute. The need for amendment arose as follows: Counsel for plaintiffs had drafted the documents…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Donna Kelley v. Secretary, U.S. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Nec Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Zenith Electronics Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Zenith Electronics Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Env't One Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2023
- Patrick v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
- Torrington Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991
- Zenith Electronics Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993