Patrick v. United States

Opinion

Restani, Judge:

This matter is before the court on plaintiffs’ motion to amend summons and defendants’ motions to dismiss. Plaintiffs filed a summons initiating this action within thirty days of the publication of the antidumping determination it challenges,1 that is, the Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Sulfur Dyes, Including Sulfur Vat Dyes from the People’s Republic of China, 58 Fed. Reg. 7,537 (Feb. 8,1993) (“Sulfur Dyes”). Unfortunately, plaintiffs did not name the correct determination, but rather named the investigation of Refined Antimony Trioxide from the…