Legal Opinion
Strom v. Anderson
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided September 22, 1953No. Civ. 5326PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, Chief Judge.
The complaint in this action named Anderson and one Carl Frisk as defendants. Frisk was never served with process and at the trial defendant’s counsel moved to strike Carl Frisk as a defendant which motion, without objection, was granted.
Trial was had to the Court without a jury.
The undisputed facts are: Defendant Anderson, on July 7, 1949, was the owner of a Gar Wood motor boat which was being operated with his permission by Carl Frisk on Lake Chautauqua in front of the Viking Club property; that Frisk was a mature man, 65 years of age; that the motor boat was equipped…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gochee v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Van Blaricom v. . DodgsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Reilly v. . ConnableNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Gulla v. StrausOhio Supreme Court · 1950
- Cherwien v. GeiterNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Gulf Weighing Corp.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1972
- St. Hilaire Moye v. HendersonDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1973
- Jowanowitch v. Florida Power & Light CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
- Florenzie v. FeyNew York District Court · 1960