Legal Opinion

Younis Bros. & Co. v. Cigna Worldwide Insurance

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 25, 1995No. Civ. A. 91-6784, 91-6785PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

O’NEILL, District Judge.

I.Introduction

With respect to the procedural history of these cases reference is made to this Court’s November 16,1994 memorandum reported at Younis Bros. & Co., Inc. v. Cigna Worldwide Ins. Co., 882 F.Supp. 1468 (E.D.Pa.1994).

Currently before the Court are the post-trial motions of the parties.

Defendant CIGNA argues that the following entitle it to judgment as a matter of law:

1. The suit limitation clause contained in the fire policies issued by defendant to plaintiffs bars plaintiffs’ claims with respect to those policies;

2. Plaintiffs failed to make out a…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Terletsky v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Hutchison v. Sunbeam Coal Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Dan Lind v. Schenley Industries IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Nealy v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Jung v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Hyde Athletic Industries, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. TAG 380 v. ComMet 380, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Nelson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API