Legal Opinion
Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Kruger
District Court, D. Montana
Decided April 23, 2014No. CV 12-150-M-DLCPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DANA L. CHRISTENSEN, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dissolve the injunction issued on June 24, 2013. Defendants argue the injunction should be lifted because they have complied with the Court’s order on remand by remedying their procedural shortcut regarding Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”). Plaintiffs oppose the motion, contending Defendants’ consultation was inadequate, the biological assessment fails to address the wolverine, and for their previously argued reasons involving impacts to grizzly bears and elk habitat. Defendants’ motion will be…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Griffin v. School Bd. of Prince Edward Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Horne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Karuk Tribe v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Sharp v. WestonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Forest Guardians v. Mike Johanns, Secretary of Agriculture United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. KrugerDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2014
- Waste Action Project v. Snoqualmie Mill Ventures LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021