Legal Opinion

McClintock v. Richlands Brick Corp.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 15, 1928PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPrentis, C. J.

The outstanding facts in this case may be thus stated: The appellants, then residing at Jewell Ridge, Tazewell county, own two adjoining vacant lots, the westerly side of one of which abuts upon Virginia street, in the town of Richlands, in that county, upon which street the Richlands Brick Corporation has constructed a tramway, or railway, for the purpose of hauling clay and shale in tram cars to its brick kilns for the manufacture of brick. Their claim of the right so to use the street is based upon a special act of the General Assembly and an ordinance of the town passed pursuant thereto.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Hibbard, Spencer, Bartlett & Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Commonwealth v. MorrisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  3. Glaessner v. Anheuser-Busch Brewing Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  4. People ex rel. Healy v. Clean Street Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Cushing - Wetmore Co. v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hark v. Mountain Fork Lumber Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Benderson Development Co. v. SciortinoSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  3. Jefferson Green Unit Owners Ass'n v. GwinnSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
  4. Anderson v. Stuarts Draft Water CompanySupreme Court of Virginia · 1955
  5. Town of Madison, Inc. v. FordSupreme Court of Virginia · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API