Legal Opinion
Hanover Ins. Co. v. Franke
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 6, 1962PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
75 N.J. Super. 68 (1962)
182 A.2d 164
THE HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION, AND THE TOWNSHIP OF DELAWARE, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
JACK N. FRANKE AND ROSE FRANKE, HIS WIFE, JAMES A. BUTLER, DEFENDANTS, AND MARTIN ROTH AND RAE ROTH, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued May 28, 1962.
Decided June 6, 1962.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and FOLEY.
Mr. Milford J. Meyer (of the Pennsylvania Bar) argued the cause for appellants pro hac vice (Mr. Thomas W. Rauffenbart, attorney; Messrs. Meyer, Lasch, Hankin & Poul, of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matits v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Baesler v. Globe Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of NYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- Penza v. Century Indemnity Co. of HartfordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
- Standard Accident Ins. Co. v. Allstate Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- O'Sullivan v. MallonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Arndt v. DavisNebraska Supreme Court · 1969
- Clementi v. ClementiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
- Gilligan v. GilliganNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
- Harrington v. HarringtonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.