Arndt v. Davis
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNewton, J.
This is a garnishment proceeding. One Clyde Davis was employed by Armour & Company as an outside salesman. In his capacity as salesman, Armour & Company furnished him with an automobile. Davis was offered a contract pertaining to the use of the automobile whereby he could, if he so elected, maintain full-time possession of the automobile and use it for personal as well as business purposes. If he used it for personal purposes, he, was to be assessed with certain minimum charges for such use. On the other hand, he could elect not to use the automobile for his personal use and, if he so…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Metcalf v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
- Konrad v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1956
- Protective Fire and Casualty Company v. CorneliusNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. KerseyNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
- Witthauer v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Wiglesworth v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- American Family Insurance Group v. HoweDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1984
- MFA Ins. Companies v. MendenhallNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
- Commercial Union Insurance v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. D.F. Lanoha Landscape Nursery, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.