Legal Opinion

Clementi v. Clementi

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided August 13, 2013PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

L.R. JONES, J.S.C.

This case addresses how defendant’s non-appearance at a default divorce proceeding impacts plaintiffs burden of proof regarding equitable distribution. For the reasons set forth in this opinion, the court holds the following:

1) When a defaulting defendant fails to participate in a divorce proceeding, the plaintiff is not automatically entitled to a default judgment granting all requests regarding equitable distribution. Rather, plaintiff still has an ongoing obligation to persuade the court, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the proposal for equitable distribution is…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rothman v. RothmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  2. Vasquez v. Glassboro Service Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  3. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. LandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  4. Dunkin' Donuts of America, Inc. v. Middletown Donut Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  5. State v. Seven Thousand DollarsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. BALAKRISHNA S. KESAVAN VS. LAKSHMI L. BALAKRISHNA SARAVANAN (FM-10-0142-12, HUNTERDON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
  2. Fichter v. FichterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015
  3. JOSEPH KOENIG VS. HOFFMAN DIMUZIO (L-5180-13, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
  4. MARCIE SANDERS VS. SCOTT SANDERS (FM-02-2823-16, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020
  5. MARIA A. ROTH VS. STANLEY ROTH (FM-13-0078-16, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API