United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Coastal Service, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Judge.
For the reasons hereinafter given, the trial court did not err in overruling the motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. See Quaker City Life Ins. Co. v. Sutson, 102 Ga. App. 53, 55 (115 S. E. 2d 699). Neither was there error in overruling the motion for new trial on the general grounds.
Ground 4 of the amended motion for new trial assigns error in admitting in evidence, over the objection of the plaintiffs, the sureties, testimony of the defendant in fi. fa., Gilbert, with respect to his prior ownership of certain businesses, to the effect that an automobile collision…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Central Railroad v. CollinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1869
- Barbre v. GoodaleOregon Supreme Court · 1896
- Burkhalter v. Perry & BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Richmond Cotton Oil Co. v. CastellawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Van Dyke v. Van DykeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jackson v. Brinegar, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Costanzo v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Powell v. Ferguson Tile & Terrazzo Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Maxwell v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Haas v. KoskeyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.