Legal Opinion

Haas v. Koskey

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 22, 1976No. 52095PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Presiding Judge.

This contract is integrated in that according to its terms it merges and nullifies all previous agreements, represents the sole agreement between the parties, and can be amended only in writing. Haas undertook to assume sole liability for price. Nowhere in the instrument is there any language from which an inference might be drawn that he was acting as agent for another. Further, it is under seal. Under these circumstances parol evidence is inadmissible to show agency where the purpose of such evidence is to relieve the agent from personal liability, he having thus…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald Cotton Oil Co. v. Farmers Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Knorr v. RaymondSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  3. Bostwick Banking Co. v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  4. Dorsey v. RankinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  5. Garrison v. PiattCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Brinegar, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  2. Kueffer Crane & Hoist Service, Inc. v. PassarellaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  3. Evans v. SmithdealCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  4. Rigby v. Flue-Cured Tobacco Cooperative Stabilization Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  5. Estate of Fortunato v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API