Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Grifenhagen

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided July 8, 1940PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Foley, S.

Various issues are presented for determination in this contested accounting proceeding.(1) The principal question involves the right of the executors and trustees to set off a liability due the estate from certain beneficiaries, against the legacies given them under the exercise of a power of appointment. In the prior accounting of the fiduciaries, determination was made by me that Benjamin W. Grifenhagen, a life tenant of one of the trusts, had diverted to himself certain moneys of the estate. (Matter of Grifenhagen, 168 Misc. 568.) He had executed a demand note for the total amount…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Earle v. . EarleNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Crocker v. DillonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  3. Gosnell v. FlackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
  4. In re the Estate of BurrNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  5. In re the Estate of WechslerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Accounting of McClancyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1943
  2. In re the Estate of EwaldNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
  3. In re the Estate of MacnealNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
  4. In re the Estate of MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  5. In re the Estate of RyanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API