Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Burr
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided April 8, 1932PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Foley, S.
Separate accounts have been filed by the present trustee and by the former cotrustee. The first, by the Central Hanover Bank and Trust Company, the corporate trustee. The other by Van Rensselaer Burr, who was removed as trustee by a decree of this court, dated April 15, 1931. The testator created by his will a trust of the residuary estate, under the terms of which the trustees were directed to pay $3,000 annually out of the income to the testator’s widow during her fife. She still survives. The balance of the income was directed to be divided between her and Van Rensselaer Burr, a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Claim of Raymond v. Estate of DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Wetmore v. . WetmoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Earle v. . EarleNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of MalcomsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- In re the Estate of YardNew York Surrogate's Court · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Coar v. KazimirCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- In re the Estate of CramerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
- In re the Estate of WechslerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
- In re the Estate of RandolphNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
- In re the Estate of GrifenhagenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.