Legal Opinion
Gatton v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 22, 2007No. Nos. A112082, A112084PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GEMELLO, J.
In this consolidated appeal, T-Mobile USA, Inc., appeals from an order denying its motion to compel arbitration of actions challenging the early termination fee charged to cellular telephone service subscribers and challenging the practice of selling locked handsets that a subscriber cannot use when switching carriers. T-Mobile contends the court erred in concluding that the arbitration clause in its service agreement is unconscionable.
In the published portion of this opinion, we hold that the adhesive nature of the service agreement established a minimal degree of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Connie A. Nagrampa v. Mailcoups, Inc. The American Arbitration AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
- Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Discover Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Lona v. Citibank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Young Seok Suh v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Wherry v. Award, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Gatton v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Hoffman v. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.