Legal Opinion

State v. Ortega

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 6, 2017No. C140476CR; A157763PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HASELTON, S. J.

Defendant, who was convicted of multiple offenses arising from an altercation,1 appeals, contending that the trial court erroneously failed to allow his pretrial request to represent himself, rather than proceeding with previously appointed counsel. We agree and, consequently, reverse and remand as to all counts on which defendant was convicted. State v. Hightower, 361 Or 412, 393 P3d 224 (2017); State v. Miller, 254 Or App 514, 522-23, 295 P3d 158 (2013).

Defendant asserts that the trial court, in the circumstances briefly summarized below, violated his rights to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HightowerOregon Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. State v. BlanchardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. State v. FredinburgCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. NyquistCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  2. State v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. State v. MartineauCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  4. State v. MusicCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  5. State v. MuhammadCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API