Legal Opinion

Arca v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 15, 1987No. 1077, September Term, 1986PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILNER, Judge.

We have tried on occasion to caution prosecutors against overkill, against pounding so many nails into the defend ant’s coffin that they split the wood and have to start again. We recognize, of course, that, as an appellate court, we get to view the case from the enviable position of hindsight, and that what may seem to us to be unnecessary overkill may not seem so to the participants in a hotly contested trial. That is why, especially on matters relating to the conduct of the trial and the allowance or disallowance of evidence, we accord considerable deference to discretionary…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Charles A. HarringtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  2. Straughn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  3. United States v. Larry JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. SteeleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. TaplinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  3. Wagner v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  4. Cobey v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  5. Hof v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API