State v. Steele
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WUEST, Justice.
Defendant, Phillip Steele (Steele) appeals his rape conviction, raising multiple issues. We reverse the circuit court’s denial of a motion for new trial based on newly-discovered evidence that was suppressed by the Minnehaha County State’s Attorney’s Office, and address a number of other issues raised by Steele that are capable of repetition on retrial.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On January 3, 1992, A.S., the alleged victim, was a seventeen-year-old female living and working on her own in Sioux Falls. After spending the evening and early morning hours of the following day…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. Charles A. HarringtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Brown v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. MoellerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Black v. ClassSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Jenner v. DooleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.