Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Springer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1944No. 29734PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

One of tbe claims of tbe plaintiffs is that tbe trial court committed prejudicial error in its general charge to the jury on tbe law relating to lateral support.

Tbe depth of tbe excavation being a disputed question of fact in tbis case, liability for interference with lateral support may be determined by tbe common law, by tbe statutes of tbe state on tbe subject (see Sections 3782 and 3783, General Code), by certain ordinances of tbe city of Cincinnati which were applicable, or by a combination of -two or more of them, dependent upon tbe facts found by tbe jury. Tbe court, in tbe course of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bentson v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Dick v. HeislerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Biersach v. WechselbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Kosak v. BoyceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Hobbs v. NelsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bree v. JalbertNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  2. Plaster v. Akron Union Passenger Depot Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Leach, Admx. v. NannaOhio Court of Appeals · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API