Legal Opinion

Kerouac v. Town of Hollis

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 1, 1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The defendant, the Town of Hollis, appeals from a Superior Court {Goode, J.) order awarding the plaintiffs, Paul E. And Y Karen Kerouac, damages and attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. *555§§ 1993 and 1988 and New Hampshire law. At issue is whether the trial court properly found that the defendant had violated the plaintiffs’ constitutional rights to due process and equal protection. We reverse.

The plaintiffs owned a thirteen-acre parcel of land in the Town of Milford. Plaintiff Paul E. Kerouac purchased this land in 1970 in order to create a large pond by excavating approximately 1100,000…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Atkins v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Jones v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Hillside Associates of Hollis, Inc. v. Maine Bonding & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  4. State v. PennoyerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1889
  5. Seabrook Police Ass'n v. Town of SeabrookSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gordon v. Town of RyeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
  2. Town of Nelson v. New Hampshire Department of TransportationSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API