Legal Opinion
Seabrook Police Ass'n v. Town of Seabrook
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided December 30, 1993No. 92-186PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.
The plaintiff, Seabrook Police Association (association), appeals from the Superior Court’s (O’Neill, J.) determination upholding the requirement that police officers employed by the Town of Seabrook (town) must reside within the town. We affirm.
In 1982, the town adopted a home rule charter pursuant to RSA chapter 49-B. As amended in 1983, part II, article 23 of the charter states:
“The Chief of Police and all department employees shall reside within the Town during the period of their employment. The chief and the employees hired hereafter shall be allowed up to twelve months to establish…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- McCarthy v. Philadelphia Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Detroit Police Officers Ass'n v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Teamsters Local Union No. 421 v. City of DubuqueSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
- In re R.A.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Boulders at Strafford, LLC v. Town of StraffordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- In Re Christopher K.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- Kerouac v. Town of HollisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.