Legal Opinion

Hillside Associates of Hollis, Inc. v. Maine Bonding & Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 13, 1992No. 91-165PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.

The defendant, Maine Bonding & Casualty Company (Maine Bonding), and the defendant-intervenor, Reuben N. Hodge Insurance Agency (Hodge Insurance), appeal the decision of the Superior Court (Temple, J.) finding the plaintiffs, Hillside Asso*327dates of Hollis, Inc. (Hillside) and LandTree, Inc. (LandTree), and plaintiff-intervenor, Raymond C. Brophy, entitled to coverage under an insurance policy allegedly issued by Maine Bonding. Brophy cross-appeals on the issue of attorney’s fees. Based on our finding of mutual mistake, we reverse the trial court’s order granting coverage and affirm its…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. StrattonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  2. Derouin v. Granite State Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  3. Dombrowski v. DombrowskiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  4. In re Adoption of Baby C.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  5. Allstate Insurance v. CarrSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Frank B. Abbadessa v. Moore Business Forms, Inc., Robert D. Mariotti v. Moore Business Forms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  2. Bolduc v. Beal Bank, SSBCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  3. Hawthorne Trust v. Maine Savings BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  4. In re Eduardo L.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  5. Town of Barrington v. TownsendSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API