Legal Opinion

Sabrina Laguna v. Coverall North America, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 3, 2014No. 12-55479PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOULD, Circuit Judge:

This case asks us to decide whether a settlement agreement reached before class certification between Plaintiffs and Defen*921dants is fair, reasonable, and adequate. We agree with the district court that the settlement merits approval, and we affirm.

I

Coverall North America, Inc. (“Coverall”) is a janitorial franchising company operating in California. Plaintiffs brought a class action suit against Coverall in 2009 alleging that (1) Coverall misclassified its California franchisees as independent contractors, thereby avoiding the protections afforded by California’s…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Staton v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. House v. Akorn, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. Keir Milan, individually, and on behalf of the Class; Cristin Morneau and Kelly Strange, individually, and jointly as successors-in-interest to Carolyn A. Morneau, and on behalf of the Estate of Carolyn A. Morneau and the ClassDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025
  3. Laguna v. Coverall North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. Pullos v. Akorn, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
  5. Robert Carlyle v. Akorn, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API