Sabrina Laguna v. Coverall North America, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOULD, Circuit Judge:
This case asks us to decide whether a settlement agreement reached before class certification between Plaintiffs and Defen*921dants is fair, reasonable, and adequate. We agree with the district court that the settlement merits approval, and we affirm.
I
Coverall North America, Inc. (“Coverall”) is a janitorial franchising company operating in California. Plaintiffs brought a class action suit against Coverall in 2009 alleging that (1) Coverall misclassified its California franchisees as independent contractors, thereby avoiding the protections afforded by California’s…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Staton v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- House v. Akorn, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- Keir Milan, individually, and on behalf of the Class; Cristin Morneau and Kelly Strange, individually, and jointly as successors-in-interest to Carolyn A. Morneau, and on behalf of the Estate of Carolyn A. Morneau and the ClassDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025
- Laguna v. Coverall North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Pullos v. Akorn, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- Robert Carlyle v. Akorn, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.