Legal Opinion

Keir Milan, individually, and on behalf of the Class; Cristin Morneau and Kelly Strange, individually, and jointly as successors-in-interest to Carolyn A. Morneau, and on behalf of the Estate of Carolyn A. Morneau and the Class

District Court, S.D. California

Decided October 24, 2025No. 3:22-cv-01861Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KEIR MILAN, individually, and on Case No.: 3:22-cv-01861-AHG behalf of the Class; 12 ORDER AND JUDGMENT: CRISTIN MORNEAU and 13 KELLY STRANGE, (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ individually, and jointly as successors-in- 14 MOTION FOR AWARD OF interest to Carolyn A. Morneau, and on ATTORNEY FEES, 15 behalf of the Estate of REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS, Carolyn A. Morneau and the Class, 16 ADMINISTRATION EXPENSES Plaintiffs, PAYMENT, AND CLASS 17 REPRESENTATIVE SERVICE v. 18 PAYMENTS; and PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE 19 COMPANY…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Staton v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. In Re Bluetooth Headset Products LiabilityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Rodriguez v. West Publishing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API