Legal Opinion
Microstrategy Inc. v. Crystal Decisions, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided November 19, 2008No. Civil Action 03-1124-MPTPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
MARY PAT THYNGE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Introduction
The matter under consideration involves a dispute over the amount of attorney fees and expenses owed to Crystal Decisions, Inc. d/b/a Business Objects Americas (“BOA”) by Microstrategy Incorporated (“Microstrategy”). On March 25, 2008, 555 F.Supp.2d 475, this court ordered Mi-crostrategy to pay BOA reasonable fees and expenses incurred by BOA after March 14, 2005 for defending against twenty-nine patent claims pursued in bad faith by Microstrategy. The two parties currently dispute what constitutes reasonable fees and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mattie Norman, Clara Marshall, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The Housing Authority of the City of MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Central Soya Company, Inc. v. Geo. A. Hormel & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- MacHinery Corporation of America v. Gullfiber Ab, Gullfiber International and Marvin SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Rohm & Haas Company v. Crystal Chemical Company and Joe C. EllerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Viral Bhagat v. Anuja Sharad ShahDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026