Legal Opinion

Pearl v. Kaline

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 17, 1947No. Civ. No. 16078PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

Defendant appeals from an order granting plaintiff’s motion for a new trial after a jury returned a verdict in defendant’s favor in an action to recover damages for personal injuries.

The record discloses evidence from which the trial judge could have found the following facts:

On August 18, 1945, at about 12 -.30 p. m. plaintiff was on the south side of Olympic Boulevard in Los Angeles. This boulevard runs in a general easterly and westerly direction. Plaintiff looked in both directions and saw an automobile driven by defendant approaching from the west approximately 276 feet from her. The car…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brooks v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Mundy v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Fuentes v. Lee LingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Mitrovitch v. GravesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Weissman v. SeehusenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cadwell v. BoroughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API