Legal Opinion

Bautista v. USP Leavenworth Medical Staff

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided May 24, 2022No. 5:22-cv-03065Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS ISMAEL COBOS BAUTISTA, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 22-3065-SAC USP LEAVENWORTH MEDICAL STAFF, et al., Defendants. O R D E R Plaintiff, pro se, has filed this action on forms for bringing a civil rights complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Plaintiff is a federal inmate at USP Leavenworth. Plaintiff alleges deliberate indifference to his medical needs. The complaint mentions

28 U.S.C. § 1983.1

It does not appear that § 1983 is applicable to plaintiff’s claims, however, because plaintiff does not allege facts, as opposed to conclusionary…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Ziglar v. AbbasiSupreme Court of the United States · 2017

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API