Bautista v. USP Leavenworth Medical Staff
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS ISMAEL COBOS BAUTISTA, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 22-3065-SAC USP LEAVENWORTH MEDICAL STAFF, et al., Defendants. O R D E R Plaintiff, pro se, has filed this action on forms for bringing a civil rights complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Plaintiff is a federal inmate at USP Leavenworth. Plaintiff alleges deliberate indifference to his medical needs. The complaint mentions
28 U.S.C. § 1983.1
It does not appear that § 1983 is applicable to plaintiff’s claims, however, because plaintiff does not allege facts, as opposed to conclusionary…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ziglar v. AbbasiSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.