Legal Opinion

State v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided September 16, 2005No. 92,580PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Green, J.:

Billy Anderson appeals from his convictions of possession with the intent to sell methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) in violation of K.S.A. 65-4163(a) and failure to affix a tax stamp to a controlled substance in violation of K.S.A. 79-5204. The issue raised by Anderson on appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence. The State raises two arguments as to why Anderson’s motion was properly denied. The State maintains that officers had reasonable suspicion of drug activity to detain Anderson and that suspicion ripened into probable cause to…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. FewellSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  3. State v. GolstonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2009
  4. State v. FewellCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
  5. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API