Legal Opinion

State v. Fewell

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided March 2, 2007No. 95,041PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hill, J.:

In this appeal we must answer the question whether it is permissible for a trooper, who smelled the odor of burnt marijuana coming from inside the passenger compartment of a car, to search the driver of a car stopped for speeding. Under the facts of this case — where the odor is of burnt marijuana and the driver admitted the passenger in the car had just smoked some marijuana, the trooper was alone at the scene, and any evidence could have easily been destroyed — we hold that there was probable cause to search the driver and exigent circumstances supported the warrantless search.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Acme Industrial Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. State v. IvorySupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  5. State v. ElnickiSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. FewellSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. State v. GoffCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
  3. State v. HadleyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2017
  4. State v. FewellCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
  5. State v. FewellSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API