Legal Opinion

State v. Golston

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided March 13, 2009No. 99,413PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Malone, J.:

Cornell Golston appeals his conviction of one count of felony possession of marijuana. Golston claims the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress the evidence. Golston was the passenger in a vehicle initially stopped for a traffic infraction, and the police detained the driver and Golston while they waited for a drug dog to arrive. Golston argues that his rights under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution were violated because the officers lacked reasonable suspicion specific to Golston to justify the length of his detention. Golston further ar gues…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Brendlin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2009
  2. State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
  3. Babcock v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
  4. Duran v. BarrientosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Esquibel v. EsquibelNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API