Legal Opinion
Curtis v. M.H. King Co.
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided December 30, 2005No. 31353PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BURDICK, Justice.
Louise Curtis (Curtis) appeals to this Court from a decision of the Idaho Industrial Commission finding that an industrial accident she suffered in 2001 (the 2001 accident) did not cause or aggravate avascular necrosis in her hip. The decision from which Curtis appeals upheld an earlier denial by the State Insurance Fund (SIF) of Curtis’ claim for worker’s compensation benefits. We affirm.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Curtis was employed as a saleswoman at M.H. King, (King) a variety store in Eagle, Idaho. On June 11, 2001, she suffered an accident while she was moving…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Shawver v. Huckleberry Estates, L.L.C.Idaho Supreme Court · 2004
- Uhl v. Ballard Medical Products, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
- Bowman v. Twin Falls Const. Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
- Hoskinson v. HoskinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
- Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. PedersenIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Morris v. Hap Taylor & Sons, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2013
- Serrano v. Four Seasons FramingIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
- Fonseca v. Corral Agriculture, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
- Izaguirre v. R & L Carriers Shared Services, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
- Allen v. ReynoldsIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.