Daigle v. Daigle
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
GLASSMAN, Justice.
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (Liberty Mutual) appeals from the decision of the Appellate Division of the Workers’ Compensation Commission, affirming the decision of the Commissioner that the failure of Omer Daigle (Daigle), a self-employed claimant, to notify his insurer, Liberty Mutual, within thirty days of a work-related injury did not bar Daigle’s claim for compensation. We find no error in the ruling of the Appellate Division and deny the appeal.
I
By stipulation of the parties, the sole issue presented to the Commissioner was whether, since Daigle was self-employed,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dunton v. Eastern Fine Paper CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- American Mut. Ins. Companies v. MurraySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- Ross v. Oxford Paper CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
- Levesque v. ShoreySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
- Wentzell v. Timberlands, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Martin v. Scott Paper Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
- Solar Pane Insulating Glass v. HANSEENDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Roger Desgrosseilliers v. Auburn Sheet Metal at al.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2021
- Brodeur v. NMC HomecareSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- Daigle v. DaigleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.