Legal Opinion

Maguire v. Ohio Casualty Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 12, 1992No. 213PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Where a policy of liability insurance clearly provides otherwise, does the carrier’s duty to defend its insured nevertheless continue after the carrier, in good faith, has exhausted its coverage by settling a third party death claim against its insured for policy limits. The trial court held that the duty to provide a defense did not survive a good faith exhaustion of coverage and entered judgment for the carrier. After careful review, we affirm.

On January 20,1989, June Zart was killed as a result of a collision with a vehicle owned by Thomas W. Maguire and operated by his son,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Pareti v. Sentry Indem. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
  3. Fedas v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Pelagatti v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Dercoli v. Pennsylvania National Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dennis Haugh v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  2. Humberston v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Benchmark Insurance Co. v. SparksNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  4. American States Insurance Co. of Texas v. Arnold, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1996
  5. Anglo-American Insurance Co. v. MolinCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API