Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Town of Lowndesboro

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 12, 2006No. 1041071PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs below, the Town of Lowndesboro and Lee Frazer (hereinafter "the petitioners"), were awarded "interim" attorney fees and expenses in their declaratory-judgment action against the Alabama Department of Environmental Management ("ADEM"). The petitioners' declaratory-judgment action arose out of ADEM's approval of the construction of a landfill in Lowndes County. ADEM appealed the trial court's order, and the Court of Civil Appeals reversed the trial court's decision. Lowndesboro and Frazer then petitioned this Court for certiorari review. We granted the petition, and we now affirm…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Alabama Dept. of Transp. v. Harbert Intern., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  2. Ex Parte Alabama Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  3. Ex Parte Alabama Dept. of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  4. Chapman v. GoodenSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  5. Lee v. Hale County Board of EducationSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API