Legal Opinion · Dissent

Eckhardt v. Village Inn (Vicorp)

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 10, 1992No. 90SC701Published

1DissentChief Justice Rovira

The majority today holds that, not only does a subrogated insurance carrier have an obligation to act reasonably in determining whether to consent to settlement of a third-party suit, but the carrier is obligated to make a good faith appraisal of the suit and act accordingly, which may include intervention in the third-party suit as a demonstration of reasonableness. See maj. op. at 858, 862. Because I believe that the majority’s decision interposes a rule into the Colorado Workers’ Compensation Act (the Act) which derogates from the long-established principle that such rule-making is the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Travelers Insurance Co. v. SavioSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  2. Danielson v. Castle Meadows, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  3. Griffin v. SW Devanney & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  4. Kraus v. Artcraft Sign Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  5. Chartier v. Winslow Crane Service CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API