Legal Opinion

Oppenheimer v. Sayer

Illinois Circuit Court

Decided July 18, 1890Published

Bill for injunction to restrain an employe from breaking' Ms contract not to engage in business. Bill filed January 19, 1889. Heard before Judge Murray F. Tuley. Case No, 70,972.

1Opinion of the CourtTuley, J.

The complainants, doing business in New York and Chicago, selling sausage casings, butchers’ supplies, meat and meat products, in 1884 employed the defendant, then about twenty years of age, as a traveling salesman, at a salary of seven dollars per week and one per cent, upon all sales made by him; and a few days after procured from the defendant a written agreement, in substance, that in consideration of such employment and of one dollar and other good and sufficient considerations, not to make known any information or trade secrets relative to the business of complainants, and that neither…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Diamond Match Co. v. . RoeberNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Philadelphia Ball Club, Ltd. v. LajoieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  3. Harding v. American Glucose Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Harrison v. Glucose Sugar Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1902
  5. O. & W. Thum Co. v. TloczynskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API