Branch v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
1Opinion of the Court
DISSENTING OPINION
DAVID PURYEAR, Justice.
I agree with the majority’s disposal of Branch’s first two issues. I further agree with the majority that the prosecutor’s statement related to parole was improper and that Branch’s attorney should have objected to the statement. However, because I disagree that Branch has shown either that his defense attorney was ineffective or that he was prejudiced as a result of his attorney’s failure to object, I must respectfully dissent.
Was counsel ineffective?
A defendant receives ineffective assistance only if counsel’s performance undermined the trial process…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Wong v. BelmontesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.