Legal Opinion

Branch v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided March 18, 2011No. 03-09-00477-CRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

DISSENTING OPINION

DAVID PURYEAR, Justice.

I agree with the majority’s disposal of Branch’s first two issues. I further agree with the majority that the prosecutor’s statement related to parole was improper and that Branch’s attorney should have objected to the statement. However, because I disagree that Branch has shown either that his defense attorney was ineffective or that he was prejudiced as a result of his attorney’s failure to object, I must respectfully dissent.

Was counsel ineffective?

A defendant receives ineffective assistance only if counsel’s performance undermined the trial process…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Wong v. BelmontesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API