Legal Opinion

Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Conway

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided May 24, 2013No. Civil Action No. 3:11-51-DCRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DANNY C. REEVES, District Judge.

This matter is pending for consideration of motions for summary judgment filed by Plaintiff Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation (“Merck”) and Defendant Kentucky Attorney General Jack Conway (“AG”). [Record Nos. 64, 65] Both parties contend that there are no genuine issues of material fact. And each asserts that it/he is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. For the reasons discussed below, the Court will grant the AG’s motion and deny the relief requested by Merck.

I

This action is related to Merck’s marketing and distribution of the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Dion R. McPherson v. Michigan High School Athletic Association, Inc., Board of Education of the Public Schools of the City of Ann ArborCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. International Paper Co. v. Harris CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2013
  2. American Bankers Management Co. v. HeryfordDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2016
  3. City of Chicago v. Door Dash, IncDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024
  4. City of Chicago v. Door Dash, IncDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
  5. City of East St. Louis, Illinois v. Monsanto CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API