Legal Opinion

City of East St. Louis, Illinois v. Monsanto Corporation

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided March 12, 2024No. 3:21-cv-00232Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS CITY OF EAST ST. LOUIS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 3:21-cv-232-DWD ) MONSANTO CO., PHARMACIA LLC, ) and SOLUTIA, INC., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM & ORDER DUGAN, District Judge: Before the Court is Defendants’ Combined Motion to Disqualify Counsel and to Stay (“Combined Motion”). (Doc. 137). Plaintiff filed a Memorandum in Opposition to the Combined Motion. (Doc. 140). The matter was the subject of a hearing on February 1, 2024. (Docs. 168 & 169). As explained below, the Combined Motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Marshall v. Jerrico, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Alfred B. Freeman v. Chicago Musical Instrument Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  4. Comden v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Watkins v. Trans Union, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API