Commonwealth v. Fontanez
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZAPPALA, Justice.
The issue in this case is whether $2,650 that police seized from Efraim Fontanez, Appellant, should be returned to him or should remain in the possession of the government. For the reasons that follow, we find that the money must be returned to Appellant.
Appellant was driving through his Philadelphia neighborhood at 8:30 p.m. when a police officer stopped him for a traffic violation.1 As Appellant exited his car, the officer noticed an open paper bag containing money lying on the floor. The officer testified to being familiar with Appellant and his family and their…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Petition of KoenigSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. YoungeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
3Cited by26 opinions
- Commonwealth v. $6,425.00 Seized from EsquilinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Singleton v. JohnsonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- State v. AgeeNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.