Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. $6,425.00 Seized from Esquilin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 15, 2005PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice CASTILLE.

This appeal raises questions concerning the proper inferences available in a forfeiture case, as well as the proper standard for reviewing a trial court's forfeiture determination. The Commonwealth Court panel in this case overturned the trial court’s determination that $6,425.00 in cash found on appellee Richard Esquilin1 subsequent to his arrest for participating as the “money man” in illegal drug transactions was subject to forfeiture. In ordering the entire sum forfeited, the trial court found: (1) that a sufficient nexus existed between the money and the illegal…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Daniels v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Commonwealth v. Real Property & Improvements Commonly Known as 5444 Spruce StreetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Commonwealth v. 502-504 Gordon StreetCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. MarshallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. 1997 Chevrolet & Contents Seized From YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Commonwealth v. All That Certain Lot or Parcel of Land Located at 605 University DriveSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Singleton v. JohnsonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Bethea-Tumani v. Bureau of Professional & Occupational AffairsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API