Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Younge

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 6, 1995No. 1158PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROWLEY, President Judge:

We are asked in this appeal to determine whether it is improper for a trial court to inquire into the source and intended use of confiscated currency when a claimant petitions for its return under Pa.R.Crim.P. 324. 1 Appellant Ossie Harrington Younge claims that in undertaking such inquiries the trial court placed an “improper and undue burden” upon him. Consequently, the trial court abused its discretion in denying his petition for return of $22,080.00, seized by police when appellant was stopped for speeding.

After careful review of the record and applicable case law,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. One 1958 Plymouth Sedan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Commonwealth v. GiffinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. In re MagliscoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Commonwealth v. 502-504 Gordon StreetCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. FassnachtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DurhamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Commonwealth v. FontanezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. JohnsonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. In re Firearms, ElevenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Commonwealth v. All that Certain Lot or Parcel of Land Located at 605 University DriveCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API