Legal Opinion

Burkholder v. Cherry

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 27, 1992No. 773PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

In this action to recover moneys due under a residential construction contract, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the contractor, Bruce B. Burkholder, and against the homeowners, William and Deborah Cherry, for eighteen thousand ($18,000) dollars. The trial court then molded the verdict to add interest in the sum of five thousand, one hundred fifty-four and 14/100 ($5,154.14) dollars. Post-trial motions were denied, and judgment was entered on the molded verdict. On appeal, the homeowners allege several errors, the most significant of which pertains to the trial court’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fernandez v. LevinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Herbert & Brooner Construction Co. v. GoldenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Mitchell v. FlandroIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Homes & Son Construction Co., Inc. v. Bolo Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  5. J. R. Christ Construction Co. v. OlevskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Cresci Construction Services, Inc. v. MartinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Shared Communications Services of 1800-80 JFK Boulevard Inc. v. Bell Atlantic Properties Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Ely, M. v. Susquehanna Aquacultures, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Rodriguez v. Mellon Bank, N.A. (In Re Rodriguez)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. QHG of Lake City, Inc. v. McCutcheonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API