County of San Diego v. Nielsen
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, Case No.: 3:19cv0631-L-AHG 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 13 v. MOTION TO DISMISS 14 KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, et al, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal 18 Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). [ECF NO. 8.] Plaintiff filed an 19 opposition and Defendant replied. The matter is submitted on the briefs without oral 20 argument. See Civ. L. R. 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons stated below, Defendant’s motion is 21 GRANTED.…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.