Legal Opinion

State v. Holmes

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1987No. 86-888PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue presented in this action is whether a new trial was properly granted to the appellee. For the reasons that follow, we answer in the affirmative and affirm the decision of the court of appeals.

The instant controversy centers around the trial testimony of Catherine Howell, a witness for the prosecution. Howell had been acquainted with the appellee for a long period of time. Appellant commenced its direct examination of Howell with questions regarding statements she allegedly made to certain Mansfield police officers prior to trial. When Howell denied making such statements, appellant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. ReedOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. DuffyOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  3. State v. StearnsOhio Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. BastonOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Apanovitch v. HoukCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  3. State v. RichcreekOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. State v. CrawfordOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. State v. AsherOhio Court of Appeals · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API