State v. Reed
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, C. J.
Defendant contends that the prosecution did not prove the presence of prior calculation and design, aggravated robbery and escape. In State v. Sheppard (1956), 165 Ohio St. 293, this court stated in the fifth paragraph of the syllabus, that:
“In an appeal from a conviction in a criminal case, this court will not retry the issues of fact but will confine its consideration to a determination of whether there is sufficient evidence to have warranted the submission of the case to the jury and whether there is sufficient substantial evidence to support the verdict rendered.” This is the standard of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. CottonOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. WoodsOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. WareOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. DickOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. DuffyOhio Supreme Court · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- State v. CampbellOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. FearsOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- United States v. Herman E. LaneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.