Legal Opinion

State v. Baston

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1999No. 97-2204PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.

In this appeal, Bastón has raised eight propositions of law. Finding none meritorious, we affirm his convictions. In addition, we have independently reviewed the record, weighed the aggravating circumstance against the mitigating factors, and examined the proportionality of the death sentence in this case in comparison to the penalty imposed in similar cases. Upon a complete review of the record, we affirm Baston’s convictions and sentences.

Jury Waiver

In his first proposition of law, Bastón argues that a jury waiver in a capital case is not made knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. State v. LongOhio Supreme Court · 1978

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. HaleOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. Adams (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API