Legal Opinion

Crow v. Boeing Co.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 1, 2005No. 54955-3-IPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*321¶1 Washington’s Industrial Insurance Act (IIA), Title 51 RCW, generally bars actions by workers against their employers for workplace injuries.1 This statutory bar is subject to the narrow exception that such an action is not precluded where an employer deliberately intends to injure an employee.2 Our courts have construed this provision to require that there be actual knowledge that an employee’s injury is certain to occur and willful disregard of such knowledge.3 Here, Scott Crow fails to establish any genuine issue of material fact for either of these requirements. Accordingly, we affirm…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Vallandigham v. Clover Park School District No. 400Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Vallandigham v. CLOVER PARK SCHOOL DIST.Washington Supreme Court · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Walston v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. Crow v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  3. Crow v. the Boeing Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API