Legal Opinion

Kumar Indus. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided September 14, 2026No. 25-00081Published

1Opinion of the Court

Slip Op. 26-112 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE KUMAR INDUSTRIES AND BAJAJ HEALTHCARE LIMITED, Plaintiffs, v. Before: Jennifer Choe-Groves, Judge UNITED STATES, Court No. 25-00081 Defendant, and DEER PARK GLYCINE, LLC, Defendant-Intervenor. OPINION AND ORDER [Sustaining in part and remanding in part the U.S. Department of Commerce’s final determination in the 2022–23 administrative review of the antidumping duty order of glycine from India.] Dated: September 14, 2026 Lizbeth R. Levinson, Fox Rothschild LLP, of Washington, D.C., argued for Plaintiffs Kumar Industries and Bajaj…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. F.lli De Cecco di Filippo Fara S. Martino S.p.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  2. Yangzhou Bestpak Gifts & Crafts Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  3. Ta Chen Stainless Steel Pipe, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  4. Zhejiang Dunan Hetian Metal Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  5. Albemarle Corp. & Subsidiaries v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API